11/9/2019 R On Visual Studio For Mac
Visual Studio for Mac is composed of a set of extensions, each of these extensions provides a specific feature or a set of features. Team Collaboration and Visual Studio for Mac As Expected, Visual Studio for Mac supports source control which is an essential for any development team.
In a '.NET Core' world, you should have considerably less trouble with that. I know I've been managing my projects from the dotnet command line tool for a while now.
![]()
The GUI was always kind of an inconvenience for that. Of course you could use the GUI to stage some changes to the project file, but before checking it in, you should remove all the VS specific cruft and slim it down to pure.NET. On the other hand, if you're still programming in C and C (I write Linux kernel modules in VS) you're screwed. We've upgraded to the next version of Visual Studio when the version after that has been out for a few months. We get the benefits of the latest VS by: - Build a VM with the latest VS and static analysis tools - Put our source code on the VM - Build with VS, fix compile errors - Run the full static analysis tool suite, fix most things found - Save source code - Put source code on out existting dev environment, excluding project files, solution files, etc. Build source with the version of VS we use today (not the. #1 Microsoft has had no direction and avoided any statement of direction on WPF / desktop UI for the last 8 years.
MS wanted everyone to build store apps which didn't fly for corporations #2 Microsoft in a friendly has packed a suitcase and is heading to the door to leave WPF / Winforms / WinUI with sending back to the GitHub repository a 'thinking of you card' every Christmas and Easter. #3 Microsoft is remaking itself into a company which sells an Office suite, Windows server operating systems, Windows des. 1) WPF is called UWP now. It's been since the rewrite. It's pretty nice and while the rewrite never really caught on because WPF was more 'nerd friendly', UWP was clearly more user friendly.
WPF didn't require a graphics artist, UWP did. That said, if you invest some time in UWP and learning to make more appy type apps as opposed to applications, you'll like it. 2) Winforms had to go.
It was a thin and almost useless replacement for Visual Basic 6. You would never consider writing a new applicatio. A lot of people around here don't keep up with Microsoft technology, so here's a few notes and caveats: 1. The Windows and Mac versions of Visual Studio 2019 are completely separate products built from different code bases.
They share compilers and.NET Core stuff, and a lot of work is going into making the editors feel the same. But you can't actually use Visual Studio for Mac to work on classic Win32 /.NET Framework applications. Windows Forms and WPF are also Windows-only technology, and that isn't changing even though they'll work with.NET Core 3.
There are way too many hooks and dependencies on Windows-specific technology (e.g. DirectX, text rendering, themes, handles) for these to be made into cross-platform applications without major rearchitecting work. In other words, don't wait up for them to produce a competitor to Qt. The source code for Windows Forms and WPF have actually been available as 'reference source' for more than a decade, so there are no real surprises to be discovered here.
All three libraries are being hosted on Github and are licensed under MIT. These aren't mirrors - the teams at Microsoft will actually be doing their everyday work in the open on Github. Unfortunately, the full commit history didn't come along for the ride. One of the nice little improvements here is the ability to package your own version of Windows Forms with your app, instead of relying on whatever is installed with the system.NET Core doesn't (currently) support static linking so it'll still have to exist as a DLL file beside the EXE.
One of the nice little improvements here is the ability to package your own version of Windows Forms with your app, instead of relying on whatever is installed with the system.NET Core doesn't (currently) support static linking so it'll still have to exist as a DLL file beside the EXE. I'm curious about why you would want to do this. Windows Forms has been around for such a long time I would have thought that the technology would be considered a stable standard by now. Or is the intention to package it up for non-windows platforms?
The Windows and Mac versions of Visual Studio 2019 are completely separate products built from different code bases. They share compilers and.NET Core stuff, and a lot of work is going into making the editors feel the same.
But you can't actually use Visual Studio for Mac to work on classic Win32 /.NET Framework applications. Doe this mean that I can now build an C#/Xamarin iOS/Android/MS app on OS X using VS for OS X, instead of writing in Windows and still requiring an OS X box for submission? 'M$ going bankrupt and ceasing to exist and taking all their crap software with it' Going bankrupt?
MS continues to transition away from its legacy products that are basically purchased and installed on clients' computers. They are moving towards cloud-based products and services such as its Azure platform and Office 365. They have become the biggest contributor of open source for the past two years. And they are still generating handsome profits. They are also merging their proprietary products with Open Sou. I was reading that baby rant too. X is also pretty much on the way out too.
So we'd have to make allowances for Wayland instead right? And holy baby jesus.
Wayland is 5 years from being borderline usable each day. As for the POSIX compliant version of WPF, WinUI and Windows.Forms. I'm pretty sure he doesn't really know what POSIX means. Though it's really cute when he uses it wrong over and over again. Mono.NET supports Windows.Forms and has a WPF like system and WinUI is certainly on it's way to. Windows Forms and WPF are also Windows-only technology, and that isn't changing even though they'll work with.NET Core 3. There are way too many hooks and dependencies on Windows-specific technology (e.g.
DirectX, text rendering, themes, handles) for these to be made into cross-platform applications without major rearchitecting work. In other words, don't wait up for them to produce a competitor to Qt. Wouldn't WINE potentially have all the missing bits? With.NET Core and WinForms/WPF under the MIT license, WINE under LGPL it should be possible to build non-Windows versions of both OSS and proprietary apps on the Microsoft stack with very little hassle. Granted, the WINE reimplementations might have bugs or limitations but when you have an open source running on top it should be a lot easier to do a side-by-side comparison with Windows and confirm that at least for the way WinForms/WPF uses these librari.
You need to study up some. ISO standardization is not an openness seal of approval - it says absolutely nothing about the openness of the item being standardized. There's documentation on this from ISO if you bother to look. Sure, 'strict' MOOXML is slightly more open than non-strict.
But nobody uses it, and Microsoft sets non-strict as the default format in its Office programs. MOOXML governance processes are closed. MOOXML last I checked was protected by a revocable patent promise not worth the pa.
Today, we are happy to share with you the next update to Visual Studio for Mac 2017. Version 7.7 incorporates much of your great feedback and is aimed at improving the core development experience for every project type from.NET Core to Xamarin and Unity. Below are just a few of the new features in Visual Studio 2017 for Mac 7.7 – for the full release notes, please read on. Improved IntelliSense with brace completions, smart indenting and lightbulbs Visual Studio 2017 for Mac 7.7 includes a number of improvements to the IntelliSense experience.
![]()
Most of the updated features will feel right at home to folks who are familiar with Visual Studio, including quick fix suggestions as well as the “lightbulb” experience. Now, when there are suggested fixes, you’ll get an icon next to the line number which indicates the type of fix available: a lightbulb for a suggestion, a lightbulb with an error symbol for an error, or a wrench for refactoring options and suggestions. We have also made several improvements to brace-matching and smart indenting in this release.NET Core 2.2 (preview) Support If you’re interested in trying out the latest and greatest ASP.NET Core features, you can now work with.NET Core 2.2-based projects in Visual Studio 2017 for Mac. Once you have the, you will able to accomplish all the tasks you currently can with.NET Core 2.1, including creating a new project, opening an existing project, debugging, and deploying.NET Core 2.2 can live side-by-side with.NET Core 2.1, so all you need to do is select the appropriate target framework when creating a new project. For existing projects, you can easily update the target framework in the.csproj file. If you don’t want to use.NET Core 2.2 on a project, it will continue to target the same version as before. There are several improvements in ASP.NET Core 2.2 (Preview) including:.
Improved routing with parameter transformers. A new built-in service for link generation. A health-check service for Entity Framework DBContexts. Improvements to the data model validation system. A much faster HTTP client To learn more about the new ASP.NET Core 2.2 preview features, read on. Azure Functions 2.0 support Azure Functions give you the ability to run your code in a scalable and cost-efficient way using the power of the cloud.
Whether you’re creating an API or want to respond to some event, Azure Functions have you covered. This release of Visual Studio for Mac adds support for the latest version of Azure Functions. With version 2.0 of Azure Functions, you now have access to a portable, cross-platform host runtime, which increases the flexibility of your Azure Function deployment. Visual Studio for Mac offers you a beautiful macOS development environment for all your Azure Functions needs. Xamarin.Android Build Performance Improvements This version of Visual Studio for Mac is also the first version to feature our work on improving the build performance for Xamarin.Android projects. This was another top request from our users, and we are happy to be able to share our work with you today. The results speak for themselves, with improved deployment and build times, whether it’s the first build or the fiftieth.
For example, our test projects saw an average of a four second decrease in incremental build times. More details on the changes, as well as detailed metrics and comparisons, can be found here:. Support for license verification behind a proxy server We have addressed the highest voted issue from, and now Visual Studio for Mac can be activated from behind many proxy server configurations that we have been able to test with.
Addressing this issue took us a while as we were not able to effectively reproduce the issue in-house –we wanted to thank several users who directly worked with us to give us logs and validate the fixes within their environments. If you continue to see issues activating Visual Studio for Mac after this update, please report them via our Developer Community and we will take an immediate look. Publish ASP.NET Core projects to a folder We all love Azure, but sometimes you need to publish your ASP.NET projects elsewhere, and we want to ensure that’s a smooth experience. Version 7.7 introduces a new publishing destination: a folder! Now you can publish to any folder or file share (network drive), and either run the page locally or host it anywhere you like.
TFVC Extension Update Along with Visual Studio for Mac, we are also releasing an update to the TFVC extension. This extension provides support for connecting to both Azure DevOps based TFVC repositories as well as on-premise servers. Though the extension is still in a preview state, we encourage you to install it via the Extension Gallery located under Visual Studio Extensions and give it a try. The latest preview contains many bug fixes and stability improvements. We welcome any and all feedback that you have on this extension as we prepare to integrate it as a core feature in Visual Studio for Mac’s future updates as previously called out in our. Share your Feedback Addressing reliability and performance issues in Visual Studio for Mac remains our top priority.
Your feedback is extremely important to us and helps us prioritize the issues that are most impacting your workflow. There are several ways that you can reach out to us:. Use the tool in Visual Studio for Mac. You can track and comment on your issues on the portal. In addition to filing issues, you can also add your vote or comment on existing issues.
This helps us assess the impact of the issue. Cody Beyer, Program Manager Cody is a Program Manager on the Visual Studio for Mac team. His main areas of focus are around performance and reliability of the IDE. He enjoys making mobile applications and trying new technologies.
Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |